10 Components of a Successful Vibration Program – Part 4 – Right Tools and Right Data

By Alan Friedman Uptime magazine June / July 2016

Download PDF version

Buy my book Audit it Improve it on Amazon

audit-it-improve-it-alan-friedman

Part 6  http://www.zencovibrations.com/part-6-10-components-successful-condition-monitoring-program/

Part 5  http://www.zencovibrations.com/10-components-part-5-right-understanding-analysis-reporting/

Part 4  http://www.zencovibrations.com/10-components-of-a-successful-vibration-program-part-4/

Part 3  http://www.zencovibrations.com/10-components-successful-cm-program-part-3/

Part 2  http://www.zencovibrations.com/right-people-10-components-of-a-successful-vibration-program/

Part 1  http://www.zencovibrations.com/10-components-of-a-successful-vibration-program/

Buy my book on Amazon: Audit it Improve it

For your vibration program. You need the right tools for the job. In the case of vibration analysis and other CM technologies, it is important that the goals of the program are well understood (right goals) and the tools match the skill levels of the people who will use them (right people). Sadly, most people purchase the tools before understanding their goals and before understanding the technology. Many programs end up being limited or defined by the capabilities (or lack thereof) of the system they purchased.

There are many different uses or applications for vibration analysis and there are many different tools on the market, so the best place to start is by understanding your goals. Vibration analysis can be used for troubleshooting, acceptance testing, structural analysis or resonance testing, process monitoring, simple alarming etc. Each of these applications requires tools with different capabilities.
A common goal of vibration analysis is to enable condition based maintenance, so let’s take that as a goal for the purpose of this article and see what features we would look for in a tool. Condition monitoring is a process of taking the same data on the same machines day after day, month after month and year after year and looking for changes. Imagine you are in the hospital and a nurse wakes you up to take your blood pressure. Now imagine you are late for a doctor’s appointment. You burst into the waiting room and the nurse calls you back right away, sits you down and takes your blood pressure. Are the readings going to be the same? Does the difference mean there is something wrong with your heart? The answer to both questions is “no.”

10-components-part-4
One aspect of “right data” is repeatable measurements. The machine must be running at the same speed and load each time it is tested for trends to be meaningful. From a personnel or “right people” point of view, it means the person collecting the data is doing it the same way every time, which implies data collection is a standard procedure, which implies it is a low skilled job. From a right tools point of view it means the data collector doesn’t need a big screen and a million features, it simply needs to be able to take a pre-loaded standard test. A simple, robust data collector with fewer buttons and fewer features might be more than adequate to meet the need and it might be more suitable for a lower skilled employee.

Buy my book on Amazon: Audit it Improve it

Wireless sensors and wireless systems are becoming more popular due to reduced sensor costs, better wireless communication, unlimited data storage and ease of installation. An important question to ask is: Is the sensor smart enough to know when to take a good reading? To save battery power, most wireless sensors “wake up” at a pre determined time, take a reading and then go back to sleep. If your machine is variable speed or load, what are the chances it will be in the right condition when the sensor happens to wake up?
Because they are battery powered, wireless sensors might also be limited in the data they can collect. It takes more processing power and more memory to take higher quality data. Transmitting larger amounts of data can also lessen battery life. In order to keep the price down and to maximize battery life, most wireless sensors on the market today are limited in the data they can collect compared to what is routinely collected with portable systems. “Right data” means that the data being collected is adequate to detect the defects you are trying to find. “Right understanding” refers to understanding how the asset fails and what indicators it gives when it enters a failure mode. These are the indictors you are trying to measure, therefore “right data” and “right understanding” are directly linked. For example, an RMS overall reading is probably not adequate indicator if your goal is condition based maintenance and a sensor that can only measure up to 2,000 Hz is not adequate to detect a defect in a gearbox that generates vibration at a frequency of 7,000 Hz.

Buy my book on Amazon: Audit it Improve it
You need to know what you want to measure and you need to make sure you are measuring it accurately.
Condition monitoring is based on trending repeatable data and looking for changes. If you have good software, it should be able to detect these changes for you. When people are shopping for a system they tend to focus on the data collectors even though most of the “full featured” data collectors on the market can easily take the standard tests required for condition monitoring. It is more important to focus on the software and its alarm or diagnostic capabilities. Consider how good the software is at turning data into an alarm, an alarm into a diagnosis, and a diagnosis into a report with actionable recommendation.
Going back to the wireless sensor example, a benefit of these sensors is they can test the machine more frequently, perhaps every hour instead of once a month. Let’s say you have 1,000 machines with an average of 6 sensors on each machine, each collecting 5 different measurements once per hour. That’s 30,000 unique graphs to analyze each hour. Who is going to analyze all of this data? If, as noted above, you are not even certain all of the data is good data, then you are really in trouble! Assuming your system is intelligent and collects good repeatable data (which is NOT the case for most of the wireless sensors on the market today) you will still need very good software with intelligent alarm or diagnostic features to let you know which machines have problems.
Most vibration analysts today do not have alarms set on most of the equipment in their database because, in my humble opinion, most of the main vibration software programs have archaic alarm features that do not work so well. Too many false positives cause users to ignore the alarms and too many false negatives (machines that fail without triggering alarms) cause users to not trust the alarms. There is also a big difference between an alarm (this piece of data is in the “red”) and a diagnosis such as “moderate free end motor bearing wear.” For wireless systems and the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) to be successful with vibration monitoring, data will need to be “right data” and improvements will need to be made in automated diagnostics (“right analysis” and “right reporting”).
If you already have a system, try this to see if you are using it correctly. If you are buying a system, this is how I would approach it: First, ask for a field engineer, not a sales person, to demo the system for you. Set him or her up in a conference room with a grinder or desk fan on a table. Ask him/her to configure the grinder or fan in the software as if it was a real machine in the plant, taking all of the data types one would normally measure. Set up more than one test point and more than one measurement axis to make it more realistic.
Ask him/her to load a route (the machine test configuration defined in the software) into the data collector and test the machine. Based on this data ask him/her to build alarms or baselines in the software, utilizing all of its alarm features on each data type. Next put a piece of duct tape on the fan or add a screw or some gum to the grinder rotor to create an unbalance (be careful!). Test the machine again and upload the data to the software. Here is the key point: See if the software tells you the machine is out of balance or in alarm – not looking at the data manually – but via an automated report. If it doesn’t, then look at the data manually to verify there was a change (maybe the fan was out of balance and the duct tape balanced it – if so, move the tape and try it again). The goal here is to see if the alarms or diagnostics work, not to see if you can manually view the difference in the graphs.
If the new data looks different but the software does not say it is in alarm or out of balance then tweak the alarm until it does. This is what you want to be able to do in real life. When (and if) you get the software to say it is in alarm, add some more tape, test it again and see if the software says it is a higher severity level. When (and if) you get that to work, take the tape off and put a coin under one of the feet of the machine to simulate a different fault. Test it again and see if the software says it is in alarm. If not, tweak the alarm until it does. When you are happy with the results, return the machine to its original state and test it again. The software should say it is healthy. When you add duct tape again, it should say it’s out of balance or in alarm etc.
Next run the machine at a slightly different speed (if possible) to see how the software handles it or tell the software the machine is running at a slightly different speed than it actually is. Even A.C. induction motors that are not on VFD’s can vary in speed by a few percent from test to test. This is a huge issue because most of the fault indicators are related (or not) to the motor shaft speed. Therefore the software needs to know or be able to determine the motor speed if it is going to be able to give a correct diagnosis. A slight variation in running speed should not trigger an alarm nor should it cause the alarms to not function correctly.

Buy my book on Amazon: Audit it Improve it

At each of these steps write a report. How hard is it to turn the data or your analysis into a report? How easy is it to edit or add comments to the report? Is the last report available and visible when you are analyzing newer data? Can you easily add a note that says “the machine has been repaired?” and see it in the machine history? Can you easily see the history of what has happened e.g. no fault, moderate unbalance, serious unbalance, foundation looseness, no fault? Can you easily make this report available to someone else (preferably without printing reams of paper)?
The bottom line is this. If it takes all day or if the sales engineer cannot make the software come up with the right answer when testing a simple machine sitting on a table with known problems then it isn’t going to work in your plant with real machines. Again, you already know what the problem is so the point isn’t to manually analyze the data and come up with the fault. The point is to automate the process and fine tune the alarms until you feel you can rely on them.
There are hundreds of different vibration monitoring systems on the market and even more sensors. All of the hype around the IIoT is attracting new companies into the wireless sensor market and big data companies are promising advanced analytics. When assessing which tools to use it is important to understand your goals and to understand the equipment you are monitoring. It is also important to understand the people who will be employing these tools, along with their level of education and training. “Right tools” facilitate and support the ten components of a successful program.
Right data is about being sure the tools are configured and utilized correctly in order to get high quality data that accurately measures the specific fault indicators you are looking for. There are a lot of technical details that come into play when determining if an instrument like a data collector or sensor actually is measuring what you want it to measure. These details are related to both the limitations of the equipment itself and to how it is configured and used. It is not a bad idea to get an unbiased opinion before making a big purchase, not just to rate the equipment but to make sure the equipment is appropriate for the users and the application.
Why would someone pay $1500 for a camera when there are other cameras available for $100? Because they are not the same. That said, the $100 camera might be perfect for what you need it for and the $1500 camera will still take rotten photos if you have it configured incorrectly or don’t know how to use it.

Buy my book on Amazon: Audit it Improve it

Right tools and right data are only a part of the puzzle. In order to have a successful program, you need to have all ten components in place: Right goals, right people, right leadership, right tools, right understanding, right data collection, right analysis, right reporting, right follow-up and review and right processes and procedures. You can read about all of these and more in Alan Friedman’s: Audit it. Improve it! Getting the Most from Your Vibration Monitoring Program.